Articles, reporting the effects of elevated CO2, are marked with *
In press 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
* Andrews J and W Schlesinger. 2001. Soil CO2 dynamics, acidification, and chemical weathering in a temperate forest with experimental CO2 enrichment. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15:149-162.
Clark J and M Lavine. 2001. Bayesian statistics in ecology. In: S.M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch (eds) Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, England :Pp. 327-346.
Clark J, Carpenter S, Barber M, Collins S, Dobson A, Foley J, Lodge D, Pascual M, Pielke Jr R, Pizer W, Pringle C, Reid W, Rose K, Sala O, Schlesinger W, Wall D and D Wear. 2001. Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science 293:657-660.
Clark J, Horvath L and M Lewis. 2001. On the estimation of spread for a biological population. Statistics and Probability Letters 51:225-234.
Clark J, Lewis M, and L Horvath. 2001. Invasion by extremes: variation in dispersal and reproduction retards population spread. American Naturalist 157:537-554.
* Finzi A, Allen A, DeLucia E, Ellsworth D and W Schlesinger. 2001. Forest litter production, chemistry, and decomposition following two years of Free-Air CO2 enrichment. Ecology 82:470-484.
Geider R, DeLucia E, Falkowski P, Finzi A, Grime J, Grace J, Kana T, La Roche J, Long S, Osborne B, Platt T, Prentice I, Raven J, Schlesinger W, Smetacek V, Stuart V, Sathyendranath S, Thomas R, Vogelmann T, Williams P and F Woodward. 2001. Primary productivity of planet earth: biological determinants and physical constraints in terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Global Change Biology 7:849-882. [PDF]
* Griffin K, Anderson O, Gastrich M, Lewis J, Lin G, Schuster W, Seemann J, Tissue D, Turnbull M and D Whitehead. 2001. Plant growth in elevated CO2 alters mitochondrial number and chloroplast fine structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 98:2473-2478. [PDF]
* Hamilton J, Thomas R and E DeLucia. 2001. Direct and indirect effects of elevated CO2 on leaf respiration in a forest ecosystem. Plant, Cell, and Environment 24:975-982. [PDF]
* Hamilton J, Zangerl A, DeLucia E and M Berenbaum. 2001. Carbon nutrient balance hypothesis (CNB): Its rise and fall. Ecology Letters 4:86-95. [PDF]
* Hansen R, Williams R, Degenhardt D and D Lincoln. 2001. Non-litter effects of elevated CO2 on forest floor microarthropod abundances. Plant and Soil 236:139-144.
* Hartz-Rubin J and E DeLucia. 2001. Canopy development of a model herbaceous community exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2 and soil nutrients. Physiologia Plantarum 113:258-266. [PDF]
* Herrick J and R Thomas. 2001. No photosynthetic acclimation in sweetgum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) after three years of CO2 enrichment at the Duke Forest FACE experiment. Plant, Cell and Environment 24:53-64. [PDF]
* Hussain M, Kubiske M and K Connor. 2001. Germination of CO2-enriched Pinus taeda L. seeds and subsequent seedling growth responses to CO2 enrichment. Functional Ecology 15:344-350.
* Johnsen K, Wear D, Oren R, Teskey R, Sanchez F, Will R, Butnor J, Markewitz D, Richter D, Rials T, Allen H, Seiler J, Ellsworth D, Maier C, Katul G and P Dougherty. 2001. Carbon sequestration and southern pine forests. Journal of Forestry 99:56-56. [PDF]
* Karnosky D, Gielen B, Ceulemans R, Schlesinger W, Norby R, Oksanen E, Matyssek R and G Hendrey. 2001. FACE systems for studying the impacts of greenhouse gases on forest ecosystems. In: D.F. Karnosky, R. Ceulemans, G.E. Scarascia-Mugozza and J.L. Innes (eds.). Impact of Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases on Forest Ecosystems. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. UK :Pp. 297-324.
Katul G, Lai C, Albertson J, Vidakovic B, Schäfer K, Hsieh C and R Oren. 2001. Quantifying the complexity in mapping energy inputs and hydrologic state variables into land-surface fluxes. Geophysical Research Letters 28:3305-3307.
Katul G, Lai C, Schäfer K, Vidakovic B, Albertson J, Ellsworth D and R Oren. 2001. Multiscale analysis of vegetation surface fluxes: from seconds to years. Advances in Water Resources 24:1119-1132. [PDF]
Katul G, Lai C, Siqueira M, Schäfer K, Albertson J, Wesson K, Ellsworth D and R Oren. 2001. Inferring scalar sources and sinks within canopies using forward and inverse methods. In: V. Lakshmi and J.D. Albertson (eds.). Observations and Modeling of Land-Surface Fluxes within Hydrologic Systems :American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. [PDF]
* LaDeau S and J Clark. 2001. Rising CO2 levels and the fecundity of forest trees. Science 292:95-98. [PDF]
* Luo Y. 2001. Transient ecosystem responses to free-air CO2 enrichment: Experimental evidence and methods of analysis. New Phytologist 152:3-8.
* Luo Y, Medlyn B, Hui D, Ellsworth D, Reynolds J and G Katul. 2001. Gross primary productivity in the Duke Forest: Modeling synthesis of CO2 experiment and eddy-flux data. Ecological Applications 11:239-252.
* Luo Y, Wu L, Andrews J, White L, Matamala R, Schäfer K and W Schlesinger. 2001. Elevated CO2 differentiates ecosystem carbon processes: A deconvolution analysis of Duke Forest FACE data. Ecological Monographs 71:357-376.
* McMurtrie R, Medlyn B and R Dewar. 2001. Increased understanding of nutrient immobilisation in soil organic matter is critical for predicting the carbon sink strength of forest ecosystems over the next 100 years. Tree Physiology 21:831-839.
* Naumburg E, Ellsworth D and G Katul. 2001. Modeling dynamic understory photosynthesis of contrasting species in ambient and elevated CO2. Oecologia 126:487-499. [PDF]
* Naumburg E, Ellsworth D, and R Pearcy. 2001. Crown carbon gain and elevated CO2 responses of understory saplings with differing allometry and architecture. Functional Ecology 15:263-273.
Niinemets U, Ellsworth D, Lukjanova A and M Tobias. 2001. Site fertility and the morphological and photosynthetic acclimation of Pinus sylvestris needles to light. Tree Physiology 21:1231-1244.
* Oren R, Ellsworth D, Johnsen K, Phillips N, Ewers B, Maier C, Schäfer K, McCarthy H, Hendrey G, McNulty S, and G Katul. 2001. Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411:469-472. [PDF]
Phillips N and R Oren. 2001. Intra- and inter-annual variation in transpiration of a pine forest Ecological Applications 11:385-396. [PDF]
* Phillips R, Whalen S and W Schlesinger. 2001. Influence of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on methane consumption in a temperate forest soil. Global Change Biology 7:557-563. [PDF]
* Phillips R, Whalen S and W Schlesinger. 2001. Influence of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on nitrous oxide flux in a temperate forest ecosystem. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 15:741-752.
* Phillips R, Whalen S and W Schlesinger. 2001. Response of soil methanotrophic activity to carbon dioxide enrichment in a coniferous forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33:793-800.
* Pritchard S, Davis M, Mitchell R, Prior S, Boykin D, Rogers H and G Runion. 2001. Root dynamics in a model regenerating longleaf pine ecosystem are affected by CO2 enrichment. Environmental and Experimental Botany 46:55-69.
* Pritchard S, Rogers H, Davis M, Van Santen E, Prior S and W Schlesinger. 2001. The influence of elevated atmospheric CO2 on fine root dynamics in an intact temperate forest. Global Change Biology 7:829-837. [PDF]
* Rogers A, Ellsworth D and S Humphries. 2001. Possible explanation of the disparity between the in vivo and in vitro measurements of Rubisco activity: a study in loblolly pine grown in elevated pCO2. Journal of Experimental Botany 52(360):1555-1561. [PDF]
* Schlesinger W and J Lichter. 2001. Limited carbon storage in soil and litter of experimental forest plots under elevated atmospheric CO2. Nature 411:466-469. [PDF]
* Schlesinger W, Clark J, Mohan J and C Reid. 2001. Global environmental change: effects on biodiversity. In: G. Orians and M. Soule (eds). Research Priorities for Conservation Biology, Island Press, Washington DC :Pp. 175-223.
Singsaas E, Ort D and E DeLucia. 2001. Variation of photosynthetic quantum yield in ecophysiological studies. Oecologia 128:15-23. [PDF]
Smith B, Prentice I and M Sykes. 2001. Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space. Global Ecology and Biogeography 10:621-638.
In press 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995